Thursday, September 14th 2006


T-accessible sites: area cemeteries #1: Mt. Auburn
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 10:23 am in [ MBTA - Boston - parks - nonesuch ]

‘Tis the season to visit your local cemeteries! There are some gorgeous burial grounds in these parts, and autumn’s the time to take ‘em in.

I recently paid a visit to Mt. Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge. It was a beautiful, crisp, clear day, perfect for climbing Washington Tower, with its marvelous view of Boston.

Well, OK, maybe “marvelous” is too marvelous a word for it. I mean, it’s still Boston. But it’s a nice view. As good a view as you’re likely to get, anyway.

I was there with my old friend Robert, the one who dragged me through the mega-maze the week before. And as you might expect given a trip to the graveyard, we got to talking about bodies, and what to do with them when you’re done with them (or what you arrange to have done with them once they’re done with you, which is the more likely scenario). I said I wanted mine disposed of in the most expedient manner possible, and thought cremation would do just fine. He objected to cremation, on environmental grounds. Chemicals and things, I guess. But until they come up with some sort of deep-space laser-blaster particle-dispersal mechanism, cremation will have to do. I certainly don’t want to be embalmed. I don’t want my body displayed (it’s as creepy as people staring at you when you’re sleeping). And I would never, never, never leave my body to science, for fear that it would end up in the hands of first year med students, who would give my corpse a pet name, and then cut off my head, hands and penis for laughs. No thank you.

If you want to know some of the ways in which your corpse is put to use when you leave it to Science, Mary Roach’s Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers is a good read. But not on a full stomach.

Robert said he didn’t know why I should care what happened to my body after I’d vacated it. It wouldn’t be me, after all. Just my body. Which I would no longer be in.

Well, whatever. I wasn’t going to get into that whole mind-body thing again with him. You know, I can understand if you have a contentious relationship with your body–and who doesn’t?–you might be thinking, good riddens! But it’s not that cut and dry. The fact is, we are our bodies (I feel like a property dualist today). If you don’t agree with the our bodies, ourselves hypothesis, go talk to some poor short, bald slob with bad teeth who’s making ten grand less than his coworker in the next cubicle, who’s a foot taller with a full head of hair and a mouthful of pearly whites. Go tell it to the disagreeable dude with the little prick in the giant SUV, honking his impotent horn and screaming obscenities at the guy in the minicooper with the placid demeanor who’s slung like an ox (trust me, I’ve done a lot of research on this, and size really does matter). Or the plain jane with irritable bowel syndrome and a persistant skin rash who can’t enjoy a day out with her perky roommate, who looks like Angelina Jolie, can eat all the ice cream she wants and never get fat, and loves to bungie jump with her hunky boyfriend, Brad. Not to mention that epilepsy, schizophrenia, clinical depression, and alcoholism are all physical ailments that play a huge role in bahavior, character, and personality–in who we are to ourselves and others.

But even in those of us without serious physical and mental conditions, don’t underestimate the power of a hardy constitution–or, conversely, the power of irritable bowels: our personalities and our characters are very much shaped by these things, too. The idea that there is some pristine spirit unaffected by the physical that’s just waiting to take flight from its gnarly old body is wishful thinking (mostly of those with irritable bowels, I think).

But I didn’t get into any of this with Robert, really. All I said was, I think of my body as a buddy, a companion in this life, and I would not want to think of it being molested in any way while I was helpless to prevent it. Maybe I’m selfish, but we came into this world together, and I would like us to go out together, too. I think a healthy concern for your own corpse is a quite natural extension of the survival instinct that’s kept you and your body together all your life.

He said, still, you won’t know any better, whatever the case. The only people it should matter to are those you leave behind.

He was actually rather strident on the point, but the fact remains, my remains are my remains. If he wants his thrown to wild dogs, I have no particular objections. What you do or have done with your body is up to you in the end. I, personally, have few sentimental attachments, aside from this. I have an odd affection for this vessel, and I don’t want to cast it off like some old junker I drove into the ground. Remember that Neil Young song, “Long May You Run”?

Weve been through some things together
With trunks of memories still to come
We found things to do in stormy weather
Long may you run.

Long may you run.
Long may you run.
Although these changes have come
With your chrome heart shining in the sun
Long may you run.

That was a tribute to his car, for chrissake. People love their cars like that, I can love my corpse.

Robert had expressed some interest in seeing the “Body Worlds” show at the Museum of Science, which I’d first read about a decade ago in The London Review of Books (I was so much smarter then than I am now), on a train from Frankfurt (and well-traveled, too), as I recall. (I mention all this only because I want to stress I worked through any issues I may have had with Creepy Dr. von Hagens long ago.) Der gute Doktor was taking his traveling macabre to all the capitals of Europe. There was a bigger hooha over the plastination and display of skinned bodies over there than there has been over here, surprisingly. I think if an American had done it we might have been more alarmed by it. We’ve come to expect this sort of thing from creepy doctors with German accents, and von Hagens definitely has that shtick down:

You can bet he’s wearing black leather gloves, too.

I do think it’s all in the worst possible taste, though I wouldn’t say it’s immoral. (Bad taste should be immoral, but it’s not.) And it’s not that I’m not all rah-rah! for science, either. But, anyway, von Hagens is more a showman than a scientist in the end. Defying British law he performed a public autopsy (the first in nearly 170 years) in the Old Truman Brewery in London’s Brick Lane back in 2002, and the reviews were luke warm at best. One eyewitness said von Hagens “often appeared out of his depth.” The Guardian reported: “He struggled to saw open the skull, handing over his hacksaw to an assistant as the bone splintered, and couldn’t find the pancreas.”

Von Hagens himself says he’s part artist, part scientist, but do his plastinated corpses hold up as art? I don’t think so. They’re spectacle. Period. they’re corpse as kitsch. You want art from corpses, take the sometimes appalling, often breathtaking, always horrifically beautiful photographs of Joel-Peter Witkin:


Joel-Peter Witkin’s Glassman, 1990.

Witkin’s pictures call to mind the beauty of Baudelaire’s “Une Charogne“: “And the sky was watching that superb cadaver/Blossom like a flower.”

Hmm.

Should my corpse survive me, that’s what I hope it will aspire to.

To get to Mt. Auburn Cemetery via T: At Harvard Square Station (Red Line), take either the Watertown Square or Waverley Square trolley (#71 or #73). Get off on Mount Auburn Street at Aberdeen Avenue. Cross Mount Auburn Street to the Entrance Gate.




Tuesday, September 12th 2006


Meaney Park work-day date and time set
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 9:08 am in [ parks - community initiatives - Dorchester ]

I have been working with the Tri-Park Neighborhood Association, Little House, and the DCR to get a work-day going for Atheneum Park/Meaney Playground, and we’ve settled on Saturday, September 23rd, at 9 a.m. Anyone who wants to pitch in is welcome. It shouldn’t be too strenuous. Just some cleaning up, painting the playground equipment, maybe some bulb-planting. Reps from the DCR will be there to boss us around. They have been very cool, very helpful with this.

If you want more information, or whatever, feel free to contact me HERE.




Sunday, July 30th 2006


Yet Another Meaney Update
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 7:37 pm in [ parks - community initiatives - Dorchester ]

I am all set to meet with Margie Lynch and Holly Richardson of the Department of Conservation and Recreation the morning of August 18th. Margie also suggested I contact the Tri-Park Neighborhood Association, which I have done through a Yahoo! group, although I am wary of Neighborhood Associations in general.

The purpose of the meeting, which will take place in the park itself at 10:30 a.m., is to discuss some possible landscaping/beautification/maintenance projects for the park and playground. Anyone interested or with ideas is welcome to come, or email me here if you can’t but still want to give your two cents.




Saturday, July 1st 2006


Mulch Fairy visits Meaney Playground
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 6:23 pm in [ city life - parks - Dorchester ]

What a pleasant surprise.




Thursday, June 29th 2006


Meaney Man
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 9:19 am in [ parks - Dorchester ]

Our resident wastrel has been back on his park bench since the rain’s let up. As I’ve said before–and I do mean it–I’ve got nothing against lovable vagrants and the like, but a park bench is not a housing solution. Bums are a sort of social barometer. Neglected parks and neglected people tend to go together.

Technically, our Meaney Man is not doing anything wrong. Parks are for loitering, after all. So long as he’s not exposing himself to children, stabbing other bums, or drinking publicly or doing or selling drugs, he’s free to set up shop. So says a local cop of my acquaintance who’s probably related to him, anyway.

Not that I would have him forcibly ejected or anything. What good would that do? There is an old saying: a park gets the squirrels it deserves. One bum moves on, another takes his place. The bums aren’t really so much the problem as the culture of neglect.

In fact, I think his presence there is important at this point. He’s a constant reminder (except when it rains) of the state of our neighborhood. He’s not actively bothering anyone, but his passive presence there is bothering, because he personifies the poverty, neglect, and despair endemic to Dorchester at this point in time.

There are lots worse scenarios for parks than drunks sleeping on park benches. I know that. And I’m not saying, simply, “gawd, I wish that old drunk would disappear.” But I think we can do better on both of these separate but related fronts–making our parks nicer, safer places for everyone in our neighborhoods, and providing better care for our poor and high-risk populations.

Doing nothing on either front and pretending like that’s good enough doesn’t cut it.

Margie Lynch from the DCR wants to set up a meeting for mid-July with anyone from the neighborhood who wants to pitch in. A rep from the DCR will be there, along with the landscaping contractor. An exact date has not been set. I’ll keep you posted.




Thursday, June 15th 2006


Meaney Update
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 4:34 pm in [ parks - community initiatives - Dorchester ]

Just got this message from Margie at the DCR:

I just received confirmation that we’ve contracted with a landscaping company to do some work at Meaney Playground in the next few weeks.

DCR’s Regional Director who supervises this area let me know that he would be very interested in meeting with any groups interested in assisting us with maintaining the park. Perhaps we could all plan to get together sometime after the July 4 holiday (when our time frees up a bit here) to discuss how we might partner in this effort. It would be great to create some momentum from the landscaping work.

If anyone in the neighborhood is interested in getting in on this, please contact me here or at mmennonno@yahoo.com.




Wednesday, June 14th 2006


Meaney #3
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 9:15 am in [ parks - Dorchester ]

As JCS pointed out the other day, the park has, indeed, been mown. Whether this constitutes the extent of the “nice investment” Margie Lynch of the DCR spoke of on the phone, I can’t say. We’ll have to wait a bit to see. I certainly would not want to jump to any hasty conclusions.

Did anyone notice we have a new resident in the park? Has anyone sent over a fruit basket? On sunny mornings our new neighbor can always be found sprawled out on his favorite park bench, sleeping soundly and occasionally waking up to briefly and loudly philosophize to himself.

Now, lest anyone think I have it out for lovable vagrants or public inebriates, think again! On the contrary. I’m concerned that our benches don’t provide adequate lumbar support. That’s why I am investigating “sleep number” park benches, to see if we can’t get the DCR to provide them. Otherwise, you don’t get the deep sleep you need, and you’re tired and cranky for your evening binge. And how can you continue to be a lovable vagrant when you’re disagreeable on account of a day of tossing and turning on an uncomfortable old park bench?




Tuesday, June 13th 2006


More on Meaney #2
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 7:18 am in [ parks - Dorchester ]

I wrote a bit about Meaney Park in Metro today.

I also got a call from Margie Lynch at the DCR, but I was at my garden in the Fens at the time (check out the poppies, peonies and roses that are popping there now). Margie said that her understanding was that Ben Affleck’s people had requested that the park be left a little shaggy for the filming (likely story) and that now that filming had wrapped up at the site she expected “some nice investment this week.”

I will keep you posted.




Friday, June 9th 2006


More on Meaney
posted by Mike Mennonno @ 8:24 am in [ parks - community initiatives - Dorchester ]

Another shout-out to Charles Swift for sending an interesting article from the Globe, from July of 1921, the year Dot’s first meeting house/free school/tavern, which used to stand on the plot that is now the Atheneum Park and Meaney Playground, was apparently razed.

The plot has not been mown since well before Affleck came to shoot a scene from his film there on the 25th of May. Before the rain this week, there was a bum-in-residence who slept on a bench there for two days.

On the 26th I wrote to the DCR, but have yet to receive a reply. This morning I did a little more research, and discovered that the DCR has plans for what it calls “friends groups” who will look after neglected plots like Atheneum, and hopes to establish public-private partnerships for their continued upkeep.

I have contacted Margie Lynch, Director of partnerships, to ask what our options are for Atheneum Park, and will keep you updated on them, too.

In the meantime, check out Edens: Lost and Found to see what cities like Chicago and Philly are doing to reclaim their urban “Edens”. We could do it here, too.